Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The philosophy of sex explores these subjects both conceptually and normatively

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The philosophy of sex explores these subjects both conceptually and normatively

The divide between metaphysical optimists and metaphysical pessimists might, then, be placed that way: metaphysical pessimists believe that sexuality, by itself, does not lead to or become vulgar, that by its nature it can easily be and often is heavenly unless it is rigorously constrained by social norms that have become internalized, will tend to be governed by vulgar eros, while metaphysical optimists think that sexuality. (start to see the entry, Philosophy of Love. )

Moral Evaluations

Needless to say, we are able to and sometimes do evaluate activity that is sexual: we inquire whether a intimate act—either a specific incident of the intimate act (the work we have been doing or might like to do at this time) or a form of intimate work (say, all cases of homosexual fellatio)—is morally good or morally bad. More particularly, we evaluate, or judge, intimate functions become morally obligatory, morally permissible, morally supererogatory, or morally incorrect. For instance: a spouse may have a ethical responsibility to camsloveaholics.com/female/nude/ participate in intercourse aided by the other partner; it may be morally permissible for married people to use contraception while participating in coitus; one person’s agreeing to own intimate relations with another individual whenever previous does not have any libido of their very own but does would you like to please the latter could be a work of supererogation; and rape and incest are generally regarded as morally wrong. (more…)

Continue ReadingInternet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The philosophy of sex explores these subjects both conceptually and normatively